Highlight any text to annotate

“(a) USTR Study.—The United States Trade Representative shall—“(1) undertake a study to determine whether any of the production-based duty remission programs of Canada with respect to automotive products is either—“(A) inconsistent with the provisions of, or otherwise denies the benefits to the United States under, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, or “(B) being implemented inconsistently with the obligations under article 1002 of the Agreement not—“(i) to expand the extent or the application, or “(ii) to extend the duration,   of such programs; and “(2) determine whether to initiate an investigation under section 302 of the Trade Act of 1974 [19 U.S.C. 2412] with respect to any of such production-based duty remission programs. “(b) Report and Monitoring.—“(1) The United States Trade Representative shall submit a report to Congress no later than June 30, 1989 (or no later than September 30, 1989, if the Trade Representative considers an extension to be necessary) containing—“(A) the results of the study under subsection (a)(1), as well as a description of the basis used for measuring and verifying compliance with the obligations referred to in subsection (a)(1)(B); and “(B) any determination made under subsection (a)(2) and the reasons therefor. “(2) Notwithstanding the submission of the report under paragraph (1), the Trade Representative shall continue to monitor the degree of compliance with the obligations referred to in subsection (a)(1)(B).

Add a comment

Sign in to comment on this section.

Annotate the text

Highlight any passage on the Full Text tab to attach a note. Annotations appear on the Annotations tab.