What Happened?

Federal housing programs for Native American communities have operated without a legal foundation for more than a decade. The authority behind the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act (NAHASDA) expired in 2013, and no Congress has restored it since. The Senate Indian Affairs Committee scheduled a hearing for Sept. 16 to examine S.5354, a bill that would modernize and reauthorize those programs for the first time in 13 years.

The bill's bipartisan sponsors, Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), have called the reauthorization essential to address longstanding housing shortfalls in Native communities. A companion bill, H.R. 8092, the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Modernization Act of 2026, has also been introduced in the House this Congress.

Why Does it Matter to Me?

Native Americans living on tribal lands and in other Native communities rely on NAHASDA-funded programs for affordable housing. Without a current legal authorization, those programs exist in a kind of limbo, dependent on annual congressional spending decisions with no long-term policy structure behind them.

President Trump's fiscal year 2026 budget request proposed cutting $477 million from Native housing programs, according to Tribal Business News. Congress rejected those cuts for fiscal 2026, but the proposal illustrated how exposed the programs are without a reauthorization in place.

Both Sides, Now

Murkowski and Schatz have framed the bill as necessary infrastructure, arguing that Native communities face housing shortfalls that a modernized federal program could help address. Their joint sponsorship signals that support for the concept crosses party lines.

The budget proposal to cut $477 million reflects a proposed reduction in federal spending on these programs. The Sept. 16 hearing will offer the first formal Senate examination of where that tension lands in practice. Congress holds the power to advance or block the bill. The committee hearing is the first step; the bill would still need a committee vote, a full Senate vote, House passage, and the president's signature to become law.

What Happens Next?

That session will not produce a final vote on S.5354, but it will allow senators to question witnesses and signal whether the bill has enough support to advance. If the committee votes to move the bill forward, it would then go to the full Senate. The House companion bill would need to move separately before any legislation could reach the president's desk. No vote dates have been announced in either chamber.

---

Spot something wrong? Report an issue with this article