What Happened?

A software error in New Jersey's motor vehicle system improperly registered approximately 6,600 people who had indicated they were not U.S. citizens, according to Gov. Mikie Sherrill (D-NJ), who disclosed the problem in July. The error ran from June 2023 to June 2024, and a state review found roughly 340 of those people voted before the problem was corrected. [](#ngr-51cd2560-3941-4da4-9f99-d5ce1638cb7c)

The incident became the focus of a Sept. 15 House Judiciary Subcommittee on Oversight hearing titled "Restoring Election Integrity: Oversight of Voter Fraud in New Jersey."

Why Does it Matter to Me?

The debate over voter irregularities has been championed by the Trump Administration. But New Jersey said that by Aug. 19, 5,100 affected registrations had been placed in deleted status, while roughly 1,450 others were moved to rejected status pending additional county-level review.

Beyond New Jersey, the Department of Homeland Security said its preliminary review identified more than 250,000 potential noncitizens registered across New Jersey, Pennsylvania, California, and Nevada, though state officials and election experts have disputed those figures.

Both Sides, Now

Republicans, including House Judiciary Subcommittee on Oversight Chairman Jeff Van Drew (R-NJ), argue the episode exposes weaknesses in voter-registration safeguards and supports requiring documentary proof of citizenship to register. Witness Josh Findlay of the America First Policy Institute testified: "Any vote cast by a non-citizen dilutes the vote of an American citizen. That is voter suppression."

Democrats counter that the incident was a clerical failure, not a structural one. Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) said: "A clerical error is not structural corruption, much less is it a criminal conspiracy."

Stephen Richer, a legal fellow at the Cato Institute and former Republican county recorder in Arizona, testified that requiring documentary proof of citizenship would not necessarily have prevented the New Jersey error, because Arizona experienced a similar software problem despite having that requirement. Asked whether the claim that the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act would have stopped the New Jersey incident was "rhetoric or reality," Richer answered: "Rhetoric."

What Happens Next?

The House passed the SAVE Act in April 2025, and Republicans later advanced an expanded version, the SAVE America Act, in February, but the legislation has not passed the Senate. Van Drew has said subpoenas of New Jersey officials remain a possible next step, as no officials testified at the Sept. 15 hearing.

Separately, the Trump administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Sept. 8 to pause a lower-court ruling that restricted changes to the federal Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program, a database used for citizenship verification, while litigation continues. That case remains unresolved.

---

This article was generated by AI pulling from data. Each article is edited by an editor for accuracy and clarity.

---

Spot something wrong? Report an issue with this article