Sen. Jack Reed (D-RI) has raised a reported $4.7 million for his reelection campaign, compared with $196,000 for Republican challenger Raymond McKay. That gives Reed a nearly 24-to-1 fundraising advantage in a race rated Solid Democratic. ​

The gap is even wider in available cash. As of Sept. 30, Reed reported $3 million in cash on hand and no debt, while McKay reported $6,748 in cash and $690 in debt. Reed defeated Connor Burbridge in the Sept. 9 Democratic primary by approximately 63 percentage points, while McKay ran unopposed in the Republican primary.

The candidates' reported donor profiles differ significantly. Lawyers contributed $336,000 to Reed, followed by CEOs ($131,000), company presidents ($110,000) and consultants ($79,000). These occupational categories indicate substantial support from legal professionals and business executives. Lawyers alone contributed more than 30 times the approximately $11,000 attributed to McKay's four leading occupational categories combined.

McKay's leading occupational categories include engineers ($3,850), real estate investors ($3,500), manufacturing workers ($2,000) and homemakers ($1,500), reflecting a mix of technical, real estate and manufacturing backgrounds.

Donors identified as not employed or retired reportedly accounted for 23% of Reed's itemized individual contributions ($644,000), compared with 69% of McKay's ($60,000). Contributions from other committees reportedly accounted for 22% of Reed's receipts, compared with 1% of McKay's.

Outside groups have reportedly spent $10 million in Rhode Island, with most of that spending supporting Reed. Those expenditures are separate from candidate fundraising totals. Although fundraising alone does not determine election outcomes, McKay had less than 1% of Reed's available campaign cash as of Sept. 30, leaving him at a substantial financial disadvantage.

---

Track the full campaign finance data at Allciv.com

AllCiv makes it easy to stay politically informed and involved.

---

Spot something wrong? Report an issue with this article