What Happened?

If you get health coverage through Medicaid, the government health insurance program for eligible low-income Americans, new work requirements could affect your eligibility beginning Jan. 1. The requirements face legal challenges as the Senate prepares to examine safety-net reforms on Wednesday, Nov. 18. ​

The U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging will hold a hearing titled "A Bridge, Not a Barrier: Reforming the Safety Net to Reward Work," according to a Legis1 review of the hearing listing. Two legal challenges are underway:

  • State lawsuit: Oregon, Minnesota, New Mexico and Washington sued Nov. 5 to challenge federal enforcement of the new rules, STAT reported.
  • Frailty ruling: On Oct. 29, a federal court struck down the Trump administration's narrower definition of medical frailty, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel (D) announced Nov. 2.

Why Does it Matter to Me?

The definition of medical frailty determines which Medicaid recipients with certain health conditions can qualify for an exemption from the work requirements. The ruling prevents the administration from enforcing its narrower definition, but it does not strike down the requirements altogether. The new requirements generally apply to certain adults ages 19 to 64 enrolled through Medicaid expansion, with exemptions for qualifying individuals.

If you are a caregiver or a parent, advocacy groups are already pressing Congress on your behalf. Zero to Three, a nonprofit focused on early childhood development, reported lobbying on Medicaid work requirements and caregiver exemptions in four of five quarterly disclosures reviewed.

Its fourth-quarter 2025 filing lists meetings with congressional offices on those topics. Across the five filings, its lobbying spending totals $622,166 on several issues, including food assistance, housing assistance and the child tax credit. An amended second-quarter 2025 filing reported $350,712.

Both Sides, Now

Republicans have framed work requirements as a way to encourage employment and reduce reliance on government assistance, according to the Legis1 review. Critics say the rules may block eligible people from coverage through reporting and paperwork hurdles, without meaningfully raising employment.

Critics point to Arkansas. A Health Affairs evaluation reported that about 18,000 adults were removed from Medicaid for noncompliance by early 2019, most after submitting no reports. It found no increase in employment over 18 months. The New England Journal of Medicine found more uninsurance and no significant change in employment in the state's first year.

The four states argue that the federal government cannot threaten to withhold existing Medicaid funding if they refuse to comply. Their lawsuit asks a court to block that enforcement. Congress enacted the new requirements, and the administration is preparing to implement them.

What Happens Next?

The court has not ruled on the merits of the four states' challenge, so the requirements and the funding threat remain in dispute. The requirements are scheduled to take effect Jan. 1, while the earlier ruling limits the administration's ability to narrow medical frailty exemptions. Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) chairs the committee that will hold the Nov. 18 hearing. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) is its ranking member.

---

AllCiv makes it easy to stay politically informed and involved.

---

Spot something wrong? Report an issue with this article