What Happened?

Montana-based hybrid PAC Leadership in Action has concentrated nearly all its reported independent expenditures in Montana's 1st Congressional District, supporting Republican Aaron Flint in the race for an open House seat. The committee reported approximately $504,000 in election-cycle independent expenditures as of Oct. 20, including roughly $494,000 supporting Flint. ​

Why Does it Matter to Me?

Leadership in Action's spending reflects its stated mission to elect conservative candidates and maintain Republican influence in Montana. Its website says it backs candidates with "integrity, vision and grit."

The race matters because Flint is competing with Democrat Sam Forstag for the seat vacated by Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-MT). Outside groups have made the contest a focus of competing efforts to influence which party controls the district.

Leadership in Action has financed television, digital, radio, text-message and direct-mail advertising, demonstrating how outside committees can supplement a candidate's campaign without coordinating with it.

Both Sides, Now

The FEC classifies Leadership in Action as a hybrid PAC, which maintains separate accounts for contributions subject to federal limits and unlimited contributions used for independent spending. The committee reported approximately $1.72 million in receipts. Its two largest contributors, Commander Zinke Leadership Fund and the Republican Attorneys General Association, provided approximately $1.225 million combined, or 71% of receipts. Commander Zinke Leadership Fund contributed approximately $725,000 across five transactions.

Other outside groups have also supported Flint. No Going Back PAC Inc. reported approximately $181,000, while Thank You for Your Attention to This Matter PAC reported approximately $910,000. Combined with Leadership in Action, those groups reported approximately $1.585 million supporting Flint.

Montana Voters PAC reported approximately $1.07 million opposing Flint and $396,000 supporting Forstag. Critics of large independent expenditures argue that concentrated funding can give wealthy contributors and political organizations disproportionate influence over elections.

What Happens Next?

Flint and Forstag advanced from the June primary and will compete in the Nov. 3 general election. Additional FEC disclosures could show whether Republican-aligned groups continue investing in Flint or whether organizations supporting Forstag increase their spending before Election Day.

---

AllCiv makes it easy to stay politically informed and involved.

---

Spot something wrong? Report an issue with this article